Summary: Similar in category, but with darker implications than ignoratio elenchi, a “red herring” is an answer, given in reply to a questioner, that goes beyond an innocent logical irrelevance. A “red herring” is a deliberate attempt to divert a process of inquiry by changing the subject.

Read The Full Article Here

-

The name of this fallacy comes from the sport of fox hunting in which a dried, smoked herring, which is red in color, is dragged across the trail of the fox to throw the hounds off the scent. Thus, a “red herring” argument is one which distracts the audience from the issue in question through the introduction of some irrelevancy. This frequently occurs during debates when there is an at least implicit topic, yet it is easy to lose track of it. By extension, it applies to any argument in which the premisses are logically irrelevant to the conclusion.

Read The Full Article Here

-

Ignoratio Elenchi (irrelevant conclusion): the fallacy of proving a conclusion not pertinent and quite different from that which was intended or required.

Read The Full Article Here

If you enjoyed that why not find a job or read our guide to working in the 21st century. You can also join our Kiva team or hire me for your project.