<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll: Is Free Killing The Web?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://howtosplitanatom.com/polls/poll-is-free-killing-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/polls/poll-is-free-killing-the-web/</link>
	<description>Exploring The Intersections Of Technology and Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 20:26:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sbspalding</title>
		<link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/polls/poll-is-free-killing-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-22153</link>
		<dc:creator>sbspalding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howtosplitanatom.com/?p=1338#comment-22153</guid>
		<description>Do you think that some of the companies that have relied on free for so long (take Twitter for example) could reduce a &quot;pro&quot; account without backlash?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think that some of the companies that have relied on free for so long (take Twitter for example) could reduce a &#8220;pro&#8221; account without backlash?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sbspalding</title>
		<link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/polls/poll-is-free-killing-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-22157</link>
		<dc:creator>sbspalding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 21:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howtosplitanatom.com/?p=1338#comment-22157</guid>
		<description>Interesting point.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you manage to find a few new features you can offer established users for&lt;br&gt;a nominal fee, people would likely pay it. One good example would be&lt;br&gt;Flickr&#039;s Pro accounts. I bet if YouTube had used this model, they would have&lt;br&gt;had the same levels of adoption (the free users stay free, the power users&lt;br&gt;pay a nominal fee) and they wouldn&#039;t be scrapping like they are now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting point.</p>
<p>If you manage to find a few new features you can offer established users for<br />a nominal fee, people would likely pay it. One good example would be<br />Flickr&#39;s Pro accounts. I bet if YouTube had used this model, they would have<br />had the same levels of adoption (the free users stay free, the power users<br />pay a nominal fee) and they wouldn&#39;t be scrapping like they are now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggy Young</title>
		<link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/polls/poll-is-free-killing-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-22156</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggy Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howtosplitanatom.com/?p=1338#comment-22156</guid>
		<description>With the numbers of sites, I think everything possible should be done in the early stages to encourage users.  That means being able to look through &amp; use the site without bothering to register eg. You Tube, to have registration reduced to email / password / username &amp; no forms to complete, &amp; all free.  &lt;br&gt;But once a site is established &amp; is providing major benefits to a large user base, I think it should be able to charge as with any other product or service.  Is say $10 or even $20 a year too much to ask of users of Facebook, MySpace, You Tube, Flickr etc ? Compare a year&#039;s usage to the cost of a takeaway ? A few drinks ? A bottle of wine ?&lt;br&gt;Seems to me that the sites went the wrong way in the beginning with the &#039;free for ever&#039; approach &amp; are now scared to change it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the numbers of sites, I think everything possible should be done in the early stages to encourage users.  That means being able to look through &#038; use the site without bothering to register eg. You Tube, to have registration reduced to email / password / username &#038; no forms to complete, &#038; all free.  <br />But once a site is established &#038; is providing major benefits to a large user base, I think it should be able to charge as with any other product or service.  Is say $10 or even $20 a year too much to ask of users of Facebook, MySpace, You Tube, Flickr etc ? Compare a year&#39;s usage to the cost of a takeaway ? A few drinks ? A bottle of wine ?<br />Seems to me that the sites went the wrong way in the beginning with the &#39;free for ever&#39; approach &#038; are now scared to change it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Koozie Guy</title>
		<link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/polls/poll-is-free-killing-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-22155</link>
		<dc:creator>Koozie Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howtosplitanatom.com/?p=1338#comment-22155</guid>
		<description>I think counting on advertising for monetization is a bad strategy. I think free should used to grow awareness and build branding, but a smart strategy would be to know where to draw lines, build walls and start charging admission to the more desirable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think counting on advertising for monetization is a bad strategy. I think free should used to grow awareness and build branding, but a smart strategy would be to know where to draw lines, build walls and start charging admission to the more desirable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silveraden</title>
		<link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/polls/poll-is-free-killing-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-22154</link>
		<dc:creator>Silveraden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 05:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howtosplitanatom.com/?p=1338#comment-22154</guid>
		<description>I think NOT as long as quality is still associated with these free applications..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think NOT as long as quality is still associated with these free applications..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NatashaF</title>
		<link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/polls/poll-is-free-killing-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-22152</link>
		<dc:creator>NatashaF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howtosplitanatom.com/?p=1338#comment-22152</guid>
		<description>Free gets you in the door, and free gets users familiar with a product that they might not otherwise buy outright. I&#039;ve liked the model of &quot;free&quot; and &quot;pro&quot; models. I&#039;m very reluctant, with the sheer number of new programs and websites online, to simply shell out $10-30 for something that is misleading or doesn&#039;t provide what I wanted. For me, it&#039;d be like buying a CD when I&#039;ve never heard of the artist or their music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free gets you in the door, and free gets users familiar with a product that they might not otherwise buy outright. I&#39;ve liked the model of &#8220;free&#8221; and &#8220;pro&#8221; models. I&#39;m very reluctant, with the sheer number of new programs and websites online, to simply shell out $10-30 for something that is misleading or doesn&#39;t provide what I wanted. For me, it&#39;d be like buying a CD when I&#39;ve never heard of the artist or their music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamesmhall</title>
		<link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/polls/poll-is-free-killing-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-22151</link>
		<dc:creator>jamesmhall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howtosplitanatom.com/?p=1338#comment-22151</guid>
		<description>I think many companies get too focused on free as a great way to reduce the barrier of entry.  But counting on advertising for monetization is a bad strategy.  I think free should used to grow awareness and build branding, but a smart strategy would be to know where to draw lines, build walls and start charging admission to the more desirable sections of the product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think many companies get too focused on free as a great way to reduce the barrier of entry.  But counting on advertising for monetization is a bad strategy.  I think free should used to grow awareness and build branding, but a smart strategy would be to know where to draw lines, build walls and start charging admission to the more desirable sections of the product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
