Comments: 6
By Steve Spalding October 25th, 2007
Under: Featured
Get more articles like this and Register for our Forum.

I think I may have heard somewhere that Facebook has raised $740 Million at an, “Oh my goodness, we’re investing in the Internets!” valuation of $15 Billion. Since this only seems marginally more sane than the MySpace platform, I thought I’d take a look at exactly what investors are buying.
First, see a few other companies that have managed to get this sort of incredible valuation. For the sake of argument, I’ll limit my search to the tech sector.
This Is Madness!
Microsoft: With about $51 Billion in revenue and a market cap of $294 Billion, Microsoft leads the pack. This might not be an entirely fair comparison considering Microsoft produces honest to goodness brick and mortar products outside of the web space. What have they made? A bevy of eyeballs, an Operating System, an Office Suite and about a metric ton of other products covering a huge range of industries.
Google: Gmail, Adsense, Adwords oh my! Not to mention a publicity machine that rivals that of a small country and 124 Million monthly users generating $10 Billion in revenue. All of this considered, Google is a titan in its field. Other than their hiring binges, I can’t think of a good reason that a company with more cash than an island dictator and enough brain capital to move into any industry that they choose should not be worth $211 Billion.
eBay: The web’s leader in online auctioning also popularized Paypal and now controls one of the more interesting companies on the web (Stumble Upon). This coupled with the fact that eBay makes almost $6 Billion in revenue and attracts 77 Million monthly visits to its site makes it well worth its $48.6 Billion valuation.
Yahoo: This search giant owns more useful web products than almost any other player in this space. Not only that but they also have the only search engine that comes close to rivaling Google. There is always a question about how relevant they are in the Web 2.0 space, but no one can deny that they are a spectacularly valuable company. According to the leaderboard, they have about $6 Billion in revenue and a market cap of $41.1 Billion.
Amazon: They are the Internet’s department store. Through S3 they have enabled hundreds of startups and monetized offsite storage, and now they are launching a music store to take a crack at iTunes. Amazon attracts 42 Million people to its site, makes about $10 Billion in revenue and is worth $37 Billion.
No..This…Is…
Now lets look at Facebook.
They have managed to capture the college market and an expanding market of marketers and business people. The overwhelming source of their undisclosed revenue comes from advertising, quite a bit of it in the form of Microsoft revenue guarantees. They have made a few brilliant moves in the form of their photo album and platform, and they serve about 24 Million users. The biggest draw that I can see for investors beyond pure hype is the hope that they can turn their ad serving business around by using their user’s public data to target ads that someone might actually click on. Unfortunately, unless they also find a way to white label the entire thing and let other publishers use it effectively, their ability to scale their revenue is locked to their growth rate.
At a market cap of $15 Billion, every user is worth about $625 to Facebook.
Web 2.0 Roundup
What is my point? Unlike every other company with this kind of astronomical market cap, Facebook produces nothing. Not only that but their real value proposition is still in the pipeline. The question becomes, could Facebook’s latest round of investors be seeing their new baby through rose-tinted glasses?
Facebook is a fantastic company and it has a lot of potential to “change the way we view the social graph,” but it’s not there yet. Until we see a little more proof that their revenue model can work, maybe we would do well to be careful how we throw around billion dollar valuations.
[Be sure to subscribe to the RSS feed before leaving. Photo Credit]
Print This Post
6 Responses
Austin Properties
October 25th, 2007 at 11:14 pm
1It seems that market spaces on the internet are getting inundated again with sites and investors. In real estate there are new large scale sites coming in every day backed by investors. Its insane considered their is less money now that the market is declining. $625 a user that is pretty crazy.
Steve Spalding
October 26th, 2007 at 1:21 am
2That’s the trick isn’t it? Many of these sites seem to be created without any real market consideration.
If there is any real theme that all of the highest valued sites in this industry have it is that they *produce* something.
Right now I am having a hard time seeing what Facebook produces.
Jarrod
October 26th, 2007 at 8:47 am
3I did the same thing that you did, Steve, when I read that Facebook had gotten it’s valuation… I did the “per user” math. However, I couldn’t find a consensus number on how many users they have. According to the oft-wrong wikipedia… they have 42 million. Either way.. its an astronomical number. $600 per user? Lets say it IS 42 million. That is still around $350 per user, which sets a WILD precedent. Who would have thought when Newscorp bought myspace that it would be a STEAL at 500+ million.
Steve Spalding
October 26th, 2007 at 12:28 pm
4I did the math based on their monthly traffic data. They get about 24 Million users a month. So it is more like $600+ per user per month.
Or more relevant. About $600+ per unique ad impression in a month.
Maggy Young
October 29th, 2007 at 3:25 pm
5Maybe ‘produce’ something isn’t the best term. Each of the sites listed helps or enables users to do something & something which is useful to them - search; sell; buy. Their value is in their usfulness. Excluding the linking to friends, Facebook maybe has no real use. A sceptic asked me recently re. F/Book ‘What’s the point of it?’ I thought & said ‘Well nothing really … there isn’t one’. This question could not be asked of eg. Google or Amazon or Ebay or Craigslist. The ‘point’ of F/Book appears to be that it’s currently popular which gives it less underlying strength than the other majors.
Dan
March 7th, 2008 at 5:40 pm
6Feels like 1999 all over again.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Related Posts
Sponsors
Read More
Join The Network
Readers
Popular Threads
Subscribe To Our Email Feed
Recent Comments
© 2008 How To Split An Atom - Entries (RSS) - Comments (RSS) - Log in Powered by WordPress
Created by: Hector Jarquin brought to you by: How to Split an Atom