Comments: 8
By Steve Spalding October 4th, 2007
Under: How To Keep Up
Welcome to How To Split An Atom. Why not take some time out to subscribe to our RSS feed? Thanks for visiting!

It looks like its open season on lists that arbitrarily link authority to some weak metric in order to ascribe meaning to what basically amounts to a randomly generated collection of news sites. The newest entrant is a list of top sites based on their Digg saturation, the number of times they have appeared on Digg.
This one actually makes more sense than many of the others. Getting on the Digg’s front page usually involves getting news quickly enough not to be a duplicate, being reputable enough to draw a large crowd (more people means a higher chance likelihood that you will get Dugg), and having enough trust in the network that you don’t immediately get buried.
Lets take a look at this list compared to some of the others and see if we can see any patterns.
Digg Saturation
Digg’s list has a smattering of Tech blogs, a few mainstream media companies (BBC, CNN, Wired) and huge content aggregaters near the top. This list seems to most accurately represent real usage statistics amongst normal Internet users. YouTube is extremely popular, next comes the search engines and then technology and political news to round out the day.
Techmeme Leaderboard
Techmeme has the built in bias of only caring about Tech news. That not withstanding, what is worthy of note is that Techcrunch and Engadget rank above the New York Times on this list. I doubt that Gabe would ever say that his list is a measure of authority, but I have a hard time seeing this as a measure of anything other than the output of his algorithm.
Technorati’s Popular
Technorati’s classic “we’ll rank you based on link-backs” list. All talk of gaming the system aside, I should note that this is the most diverse of the lists presented. I mean diverse in Internet terms, which amounts to a smattering of tech news, political commentary and an Italian comedian/politico (Beppe Grillo).
More interesting still, this is the first time Mashable, Boing Boing and Lifehacker made the list. The best reason I can come up with is that all of these sites provide interesting reference points as opposed to news. This tends to draw huge numbers of links, without necessarily putting them on Digg or Techmeme’s radar.
Web 2.0 Roundup
What can we take away from the Internet’s attempt to rate itself? Well, it seems like we love tech news, politics and funny things. If you did not recognize that before this roundup, you have been on the wrong internet. Just for a laugh, I’ve decided to arrange my own “Top 10″ list. My methodology was to pick sites that I believe hold the most value for normal users, and would likely do the best if turned into print media. Just to make it fair, I decided to only pick sites that also made one of the other lists.
The list isn’t arranged in any particular order.
Lifehacker. Lifehacker provides interesting tips and tricks for being more productive and making the most out of your day, instant classic.
Ars Technica. Detailed, Old Media style reporting. Despite their occasional lack of proper citations, Ars has managed to maintain a strong voice in tech reporting. Not only that, but they are the only ones to make all three of the lists.
Daily Kos. The Daily Kos is a well respected source for political news. For the sake of this list, I picked them because they have had more play in popular culture (via the Colbert Report and others) than the Huffington Post. I also like their collaborative reporting a bit more, it’s oh so Web 2.0.
New York Times. I have my problems with NYT and mainstream media in general, but the New York Times is still the best source of real journalism of any of the sites featured in these lists.
Read/WriteWeb. It was a toss up between ReadWriteWeb and Techcrunch. I choose Richard’s blog because it generally provides a more detailed analysis of the tech news of the day. Also, this kind of analysis would likely have a wider appeal to mainstream audiences who are more interested in understanding tech trends than in the nitty, gritty details of acquisitions.
BBC. It also made two of the previous lists and for good reason. The BBC is a media powerhouse and certainly worth mentioning in any list of relevant reading material.
Engadget. Engadget beats Gizmodo only because I think gadget news is about scale. Engadget manages to bring together a ton of material every single day, blurring the line between blog and web magazine.
Wired. What would tech publishing be without Wired and it’s related entities? No, this isn’t a trick question.
Boing Boing. The most “general interest” of the sites that I have listed. You can always count on Boing Boing to get you thinking about something. Sometimes thats all you can ask for out of a news source. Also, they also have a relatively successful print magazine which proves that they have mainstream appeal.
Mashable. Honestly, they only made the list because I once saw them put together a top 5000+ list of “web things”. I call a list like that, the Internet.
[Be sure to subscribe to the RSS feed before leaving. Photo Credit]
Print This Post
8 Responses
Richard MacManus
October 4th, 2007 at 5:50 am
1Thanks Steve, I’m honoured to have made the cut on your list. I think some of these lists are silly - e.g. today I browsed through the latest PC World magazine and saw a really stupid list of Top Web people, that seemed to be almost entirely made up of Silicon Valley insiders (it had Sir Tim Berners-Lee ranked quite low).
But really, all lists are contentious. even yours, you list mashable - yet they just pump out 20-30 ‘copy and paste’ PR news items per day. About as spammy as it gets. The top 5000+ list of “web things†just sums it up - really Steve, you should boot them off your list
Yuvi
October 4th, 2007 at 8:01 am
2I think you might also be interested in this: http://blog.yuvisense.net/2007/10/02/statbot-analysing-digg-part-ii-sites-on-the-frontpage/
I didn’t use Google for the analysis: I scrapped all the data for this myself
Oh, and btw, despite Youtube topping here, Ars actually has the most no. of stories on the frontpage, follwed by Yahoo News. But then again, I didn’t include the videos section, so that might be it…
Steve Spalding
October 4th, 2007 at 9:34 am
3First Yuvi, this is some amazing information. I am so glad that you sent it my way — consider it Stumbled.
Ha, you made the list because you run a good site Rich. As for Mashable, you must admit they its easier than surfing the web yourself.
Thanks for reading folks, if you need anything drop me a line.
Credit Reporting
February 5th, 2008 at 4:48 am
4Fixing Credit Report Errors….
After taking the first step of obtaining a free credit score report, the next most common step to improving your credit score is to correct any errors that might be present. Strangely enough, errors do occur, and it is well worth taking the time to dis…
Many Credit Card Options » Blog Archive » Comment on How To Rate The Web by Credit Reporting
February 5th, 2008 at 11:39 am
5[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]
» Comment on How To Rate The Web by Credit Reporting
February 5th, 2008 at 12:03 pm
6[...] Author wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptAfter taking the first step of obtaining a free credit score report, the next most common step to improving your credit score is to correct any errors that might be present. Strangely enough, errors do occur, and it is well worth taking … [...]
Many Credit Card Options » Blog Archive » Comment on How To Rate The Web by Many Credit Card Options » Blog …
February 5th, 2008 at 1:59 pm
7[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]
Many Credit Card Options » Blog Archive » Comment on How To Rate The Web by » Comment on How To Rate The Web …
February 5th, 2008 at 2:00 pm
8[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Related Posts
Sponsors
Readers
Links
Sections
Popular Threads
Subscribe To Our Email Feed
Recent Comments
Recent Twitter Updates
© 2008 How To Split An Atom - Entries (RSS) - Comments (RSS) - Log in Powered by WordPress
Created by: Hector Jarquin brought to you by: How to Split an Atom