Next Article
By Steve Spalding June 7th, 2007
Under: Featured
Get more articles like this and Register for our Forum.
Google is in the business of collecting personal data in order to provide consumers with value (see: advertising).
Double click is in the business of collecting user data in order to provide consumers with advertising (see: “value”).

The marriage between these two companies seems to be more and more likely as days go by and the Electronic Privacy Information Center just isn’t having it. A coalition of privacy groups lead by the EPIC is going before the Federal Trade Commission to try to force Google to release the data that it collects on its users publicly, and give users the the option of removing it.
The merger of DoubleClick, an advertising network, and Google would produce one of the largest stores of consumer data in the history of well…collecting consumer data. Privacy advocates are up in arms about the possible abuses of this information should Google, or any of its hanger ons, fall asleep at the wheel.
As described in SFGate, some of the coalitions include, “…prohibiting Google from retaining user data for longer than necessary, barring it from selling user data and requiring the company to keep the data it collects separate from that of DoubleClick, which tracks user behavior over Web sites where it places ads.”
Google makes a pretty clear case as to why it collects consumer data, some of its reasons include:
Maintain security and prevent fraud and abuse
Data protection laws around the world require Internet companies to maintain adequate security measures to protect the personal data of their users. Immediate deletion of IP addresses from our logs would make our systems more vulnerable to security attacks, putting the personal data of our users at greater risk.
That’s right, it’s the law. For organizations like Google that push masses of data through their servers, they need a way to separate out some of the noise. Tracking IP address’ allow them to act more quickly in case of security breaches.
Comply with legal obligations to retain data
For example, Google may be subject to the EU Data Retention Directive, which was passed last year, in the wake of the Madrid and London terrorist bombings, to help law enforcement in the investigation and prosecution of “serious crimeâ€. The Directive requires all EU Member States to pass data retention laws by 2009 with retention for periods between 6 and 24 months.
Unfortunately, the truth is that Google has to retain certain pieces of personal information just to cover their legal trail. It would otherwise leave them open to all sorts of litigation, should the internet dissolve in on itself and someone need to be held accountable for it. Which, when you write for How To long enough you know is bound to happen.
Only time will tell who will win this case, but as Google continues to collect and allow us to share more and more of our information it is only a matter of time before some legal body steps in to set a precedent as it pertains to online privacy. Now the result of that battle, will be truly interesting to see.
Print This Post
4 Responses
Google
June 7th, 2007 at 9:41 am
1[...] Electronic Privacy Information Center asks to the FTC to audit Google’s privacy in wake of possible DoubleClick merger? Doubleclick Electronic Privacy Information Center Google [...]
How To Understand Google’s Privacy Policy | How To Split An Atom
June 10th, 2007 at 2:29 pm
2[...] So what’s the real story? It depends on who you ask. One thing we can be sure of is that Google makes it a practice to collect huge amounts of personal data, and up until this point has been reluctant to erase it. Whether this constitutes any real breach in privacy is up in the air. With the DoubleClick merger a strong possibility in the near future, it should be an interesting story to watch unfold. [Photo credit goes to Duncan] Sphere: Related Content del.icio.us Digg it Furl Netscape RawSugar reddit StumbleUpon Yahoo MyWeb [...]
Alex van Eesteren
June 11th, 2007 at 3:42 pm
3Privacy concerns are becoming a major social and legal issue these days.
Search engines play an important role in the whole equation.
The AOL Privacy Breach last year is just one example of what can happen if search engine user-data are being stored.
Meta-search engine Ixquick.com’s simple solution: “If the data is not stored, users privacy can’t be breachedâ€.
We are the first search engine to stop recording any privacy details of our users.
Some background information:
-Ixquick is a meta search engine, developed in 1998 in NY, since 2001 part of Surfboard Holding BV.
-It offers a simultaneous search in up to 12 of the best search engines.
-Ixquick will not share IP addresses with these individual search engines while searching.
-Ixquick will delete the IP addresses of the users within 48 hrs.
In fact we have a program running which opens the log files, deletes the user related IP
addresses and overwrites the “old” logfile. Also we took away the unique ID out of our
Cookies, the Cookie is only used for remembering the settings on the user’s PC. We even
overwrite the “old” Cookie if a user has one on his PC from before this privacy initiative.
Read more on how Ixquick protects Privacy on: http://ixquick.com/eng/protect_privacy.html
Conclusion:
http://www.ixquick.com offers its users a high quality web search without storing any privacy data…
Our initiative is being met with overwhelmingly positive response.
Best Regards,
Alex van Eesteren
Ixquick.com
GOOGLE CALENDAR IS NEAT! - The Google Maven
June 14th, 2007 at 3:29 pm
4[...]  How To Audit Google’s Privacy  [...]
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Related Posts
Sponsors
Read More
Join The Network
Readers
Popular Threads
Subscribe To Our Email Feed
Recent Comments